Continuing an earlier thread, Goldberg didn’t get around to his “Conservatism didn’t fail the GOP, the GOP failed conservatism” post until 11/9. In response to his tardiness, I’m linking to his post 6 days later.
Of course in his inimitable idiot way, Goldberg contradicts his whole point within his article:
Of all these arguments, the only two you are likely to hear ad nauseam are: too much social conservatism and too much war.
Oops. If the GOP is too socially conservative and the GOP failed in the election and failure is defined as “not winning”, then… looks like conservatism did fail, now dinnit?
He starts to say something about how social conservatism brings as many votes as macacas blacks and labor combined … but it’s obviously only as many votes as blacks and labor combined -1.
Doughy’s got the sweetest gig in the world. A sugar momma momma/puppetmaster and… no, wait. That’s all he’s got. Well, good on ya with the lucky parent thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment